Thread: Flam Workaround
View Single Post
  #4  
Old 10-27-2015, 03:02 PM
rrayner rrayner is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 897
Default Re: Flam Workaround

Thank you, David. That's a different approach -- doable, but I would prefer to not have another hidden staff.

But, your example gave me an audible tip -- the 64th-note triplet was too brief and too close to the target note. I liked your sound better. So, I have changed my flams to 32nd-note triplets in measure 12, and it sounds more realistic.

Thanks, again.

Ralph
Attached Files
File Type: not Flams.not (15.3 KB, 1 views)

Last edited by rrayner; 10-28-2015 at 11:23 AM.
Reply With Quote